to download freely
What is the relationship between sociality, subjectivity and intersubjectivity in linguistic and semiotic games and performances? How to think the relationship between the social cognition in the sense of a set of cognitive processes and activities, and the social life of signs and semiotic values manifesting heterogeneity of components and dynamics constitution, distribution and variation. What is the specific rule played by the cultural dimension in the process of cognition? Following the phenomenological and ecological tradition, we find the continuity between the organic dimension of the body and its social, historical and contingent instances. Thus, it seems necessary to consider the rule of culture as transindividual phenomenon in cognitive processes, without making an epistemological break with the inner world of subjective experience and its semiotic and existential complexity. This contribution aims to problematize these issues from an epistemological point of view, focusing on the status of the sujet de la parole as a device of self-transformation and subjectivation system implemented by the language praxis. At the same time, we will be concerned to understand and outline the tensions and resonances between the sujet de la parole and other anthropological devices such as institutions and culture. Thus, the culture seems like a specific semiotic environment.
Pour citer cet article :Bondi Antonino (2015/1). Toward a semiotic and phenomenological anthropology. The speaking subject between social cognition and semiolinguistic values. In Stewart John (Eds), Cognition and Society : The social inscription of cognition, Intellectica, 63, (pp.125-149), DOI: 10.3406/intel.2015.1026.